|
In my Introduction to LAW IN SOCIETY, I identify three features that are peculiar to it, in the UK. The said three features collectively account for the violations of citizenship and fundamental rights under the English legal system.
This Article is about the Treasury Solicitor Department [aka TSol] and unqualified people passing themselves off as solicitors, barristers; at worse, as Masters or Deputy Masters in the High Court. They are bogus “solicitors” and their activities are fraudulent.
The Treasury Solicitor Department is aware of their activities but nevertheless encourages those bogus solicitors to deliver legal services to some 180 government departments in the United Kingdom.
Bogus “solicitor” Rodger Lutterodt
The most prominent bogus “solicitor” in the employment of the Treasury Solicitor Department, from around the early months of 1999, was one Rodger Lutterodt, a Ghanaian, who, once posted an item on his website, saying “I’d rather be a botanist” than a bad solicitor.
Rodger Lutterodt was well and truly bad, bogus and fraudulent. Under the Solicitor’s Act 1974 section 20, it is a criminal offence to impersonate a solicitor, if one does not hold a practising certificate. More importantly, under the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, sections 27 and 28, it is also an offence to appear before the courts or to address a Judge unless one has what lawyers call, “Right of Audience”.
Attorney General complicity
Rodger Lutterodt is employed in a government department, in a clerical position. At a point in time, he was granted permission to gain experience of legal proceedings at the Treasury Solicitor’s Department.
By April 1999 Rodger Lutterodt had begun to describe himself as SOLICITOR OF THE SUPREME COURT even though he had no legal education or training, did not pass any law exam and did not hold any practising certificate issued by the Law Society in England and Wales.
The Attorney General who, in theory, has overall control of the activities of those men and women, and some senior judges in the High Court and others, who have been promoted to the House of Lords, were / are complicit in the frauds being carried out daily by those bogus lawyers, masquerading as Treasury “Solicitors”.
Paradoxically, many High Court Judges are overjoyed that they found a mug like Rodger Lutterodt, a Black man who is happy to shit all over his own fellow Black men and women.
Bogus “solicitors” endanger lives
The most worrying aspect of the work of those bogus and fraudulent “solicitors” is the fact that the Ministry of Defence avails of the "legal services" of those "solicitors".
The British Army, Navy, and MI6 need every help they can get from Law Officers of the Crown. But what happens when those Law Officers knew or ought to have known that the “lawyers” upon whom the Government depends, are not what they appear to be and yet, they, as Law Officers fail to take appropriate measures?
There is a link between the unacceptable loss of lives in places like Afghanistan or Iraq and the quality of "legal services" made available via the Ministry of Defence to those men and women who are risking their lives in Afghanistan and in Iraq
Dog eats dog- English law approach
Rodger Lutterodt, who was born in Ghana, and came to England to better himself, did not understand that the system would always set dog to eat dog. Considering that I am Black and he is Black, he was an asset that the System could rely upon, as a sledgehammer to hit me with.
Historical outline
In March 1997 the Judiciary organised a Secret Meeting the sole purpose of which was to destroy the Public Law Centre and to manufacture bogus allegations against me. That secret meeting took place on 12 March 1997.
The Judiciary succeeded. Having empowered the police to raid the premises of the Public Law Centre on 16 April 1997, I faced the worst form of malicious prosecution in the 1000-year history of English criminal trials.
When that case was over, the Judiciary, Solicitor General of the day, and police again got together and in consequence they made use of Rodger Lutterodt to bring proceedings against me under the Supreme Court Act 1981 section 42.
The Solicitor General, Metropolitan Police [Neil Smith and Martin Robert Hawkins] and Stephen Wilcox, of the Lord Chancellor’s Department [retired] knew that Rodger Lutterodt had no right of audience, to appear before the Courts in the UK. Yet, posing as a SOLICITOR of the SUPREME COURT, he appeared before twelve Judges in the High Court over a period of time.
They were after my property
To ensure that I was never able to recover any of my property, the Lord Chancellor’s Department aka Secretary of State for Justice, commenced “vexatious” proceeding against me. The key witnesses against me were, DS Neil Smith, DS Martin Robert Hawkins, Stephen Wilcox and, of course, Rodger Lutterodt.
On 18 November 1999 I appeared before Lord Justice Simon Brown (he now sits in the House of Lords) and Mr. Newman (I have no idea where he is). However, serious mistakes, which senior members of the Judiciary should never make if they have any respect for their own integrity as one of Her Majesty’s Justices, were made.
The bogus “solicitor” who gave legal advice to Lord Justice Simon Brown and Mr. Justice Newman, was no other than Rodger Lutterodt.
More on Lutterodt
On 15 April 1997, a day before the Metropolitan Police raided the premises of the Public Law Centre and arrested me, the name of RODGER LUTTERODT was entered into a Register kept by the Law Society, as if he was admitted to the Roll of Solicitors. He did not have the education or training to be a solicitor.
On 17 September 1999, he swore an Affidavit, in which he described himself as SOLICITOR OF THE SUPREME COURT. He had no Practising Certificate and so therefore, he committed a couple of criminal offences, under the Solicitor’s Act, and Courts and Legal Services Act. He clearly did not have the Right of Audience. In any event, his Affidavit was full of holes. It read as if it was composed by an illiterate. He lied through his teeth in that Affidavit.
More importantly, the proceeding before Simon Brown LJ and Newman J. was meant to be an Application for a “vexatious litigant order” pursuant to Section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981. However, Rodger Lutterodt made a “Claim” upon me, under Section 37 of the Supreme Court Act 1981. Section 37 of the Act was in respect of an interim injunction. That Section has nothing to do with a proper Application under Section 42.
Simon Brown LJ and Newman J would have had to be completely blind not to have recognised the flaws however, since they had it in for me, they did not see the need to discharge their Judicial Oath in accordance with the requirements of justice or fairness of procedure or humanity or any other virtue remotely connected with my fundamental rights as a citizen. Their Judgment was a disgrace and the Order made amounted to a crime against humanity.
Question of integrity
Setting up Black people against other Black makes a mockery of the whole concept of multi-racialism. The English Judiciary would never admit that the System is almost rotten. There is injustice, unfairness, racism, and nepotism in the System. What do these things say of the English legal system? Your guess is as good as mine
Further Reading SecretMtg | Section 42 Notice of Appeal | SurveyOfCountyCourts1996
[1] See Survey of 175 County Court Centres in England and Wales , by the Public Law Centre (1996) [2] See The OXFORD MAFIA the ones above the law, Centre for Community Studies, (2004), ISBN 9781873156650 at €24,75 (postage free)
Order a copy at ShopNow or Emails us at euoffice@plcparty.com Tel. 020 8133 7447 | 
